Contemporary younger professionals that are examining practice opportunities often compare an existing practice to one that exists only in their head. Here's an example. Existing solo specialty practice produces $2.2 with a single doctor. A younger professional specialist and his wife, a GP, look at the practice. It is located in an expensive area of the country to purchase a house and live. However, a reasonable projection using existing production would have the young couple taking on the practice and taking home $500-600K to start. This is not shabby. This is after paying on a 5 year purchase note. But the couple turned away from the practice opportunity to start their own practice in a more suburban location. They will now negotiate with lessors, equipment vendors, and a host of others to get their new practice out of the ground. Compare the simple act of signing a purchase contract with a take home income starting the first month with a start up with no income! Hopefully, other younger professionals will see the ease of stepping in as a benefit and not a negative. If they do, they will "get it" - it is more cost effective in my view, assuming valuation and cash flow supports the transaction, to take over a producing practice than to do a start up.